Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
The Project Controls Daily
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Cost Management
    • Schedule Management
    • Risk Management
    • Technology & Software
    • Certification & Career Development
    • ESG & Sustainable projects
    • Best Practices & Case Studies
    • Regulatory & Compliance
    • Leadership & Management
    • News & Trends
December 18.2025
2 Minutes Read

Unlocking AI’s Potential in Construction: The Tipping Point Approaches

AI in construction - Workers using digital tools on site.

AI’s Transformative Role in Construction

The construction industry is increasingly recognizing the importance of artificial intelligence (AI), nearing what experts are calling a ‘tipping point’ in adoption rates. A recent survey conducted by Dodge Construction Network revealed that a significant majority of contractors believe AI will profoundly impact the industry. This transformation promises enhanced operational efficiency, which is vital in an industry notorious for outdated practices and inefficiencies.

Data-Driven Insights Highlight Builders' Confidence

With 235 respondents from general and trade contractors across the U.S., the survey found that 85% expect to spend less time on repetitive tasks due to AI implementation, while 75% believe AI can help them derive insightful lessons from historical project data. This perspective aligns with findings from BuiltWorlds, which reported that 100% of companies investing in AI cite improved operations as a primary motivator.

Challenges Hinder Broader Adoption

Despite the optimistic outlook, over half of the surveyed builders expressed concerns regarding data accuracy and security. These worries echo findings from a BuiltWorlds report, which highlighted that 62% of industry players are apprehensive about data privacy. Furthermore, there is an acute shortage of skilled workers in the construction sector, making it difficult for firms to harness AI solutions effectively.

The Competitive Edge of AI in Construction

According to the Dodge survey, contractors perceive AI as a way to gain a competitive advantage, with 86% of larger firms viewing it as essential to outperforming their peers. As the industry moves forward, small contractors are also exploring AI technologies such as predictive analytics and risk assessment tools. These technologies help streamline project management—from planning and scheduling to safety improvements and contract review.

Looking Ahead: Future Predictions for AI Implementation

Experts like Steve Jones from Dodge Construction Network suggest that the efficient use of AI tools will redefine construction workflows in the near future. As project managers leverage AI for superior decision-making, the potential for transforming traditional construction methodologies into agile, data-driven practices increases significantly. The convergence of technology and construction points towards a more innovative industry landscape, ready to embrace change.

Conclusion: Embracing Change Amidst Challenges

As contractors tread into AI adoption, the caution associated with new technologies does not diminish the clear trend towards modernizing the construction landscape. For mid-to-senior-level professionals engaged in project management, cost engineering, and risk management, the time has come to explore these transformative tools. Understanding AI’s value in alleviating operational challenges may very well be the key to positioning businesses for future success.

News & Trends

0 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
12.16.2025

How Walmart's 3D Printed Buildings Could Transform Construction Management

Update Pioneering a New Era: Walmart's Bold Step into 3D Printing Walmart is breaking new ground in construction by partnering with Alquist 3D to create a series of 3D-printed buildings, representing a significant shift in how the retail giant approaches its infrastructure. With its recent contract for the construction of more than a dozen 3D-printed facilities nationwide, this move marks a substantial advancement in the commercial adoption of additive manufacturing in the construction industry. From Experimental to Commercialization: The Journey of 3D Construction The collaboration between Walmart and Alquist comes after the completion of a successful pilot phase that included a remarkable 8,000 sq. ft. building in Athens, Tennessee. This structure not only set records but also provided invaluable insights into optimizing 3D printing for larger, more sophisticated projects. Patrick Callahan, CEO of Alquist, highlighted the lessons learned during the first two projects—an 8,000 sq. ft. addition in Tennessee and a quicker 5,000 sq. ft. project in Alabama, which took just a week to complete with only four workers involved. “We shaved three weeks off the schedule there and saved them some money,” Callahan noted, showcasing the efficiency of 3D printing compared to traditional methods. This successful experimentation demonstrates the potential for 3D printing to revolutionize the construction timeline. Strategies for Expansion: A Revolutionary Construction Model Walmart's expansion of 3D-printed buildings speaks to a larger trend where companies are increasingly recognizing the viability of 3D printing for cost-effective, scalable construction solutions. Alquist 3D operates under an innovative model where their advanced robotics are leased to contractors instead of being labor-intensive, granting contractors the autonomy to efficiently manage construction projects. Furthermore, significant partnerships with construction and equipment rental firms like FMGI and Hugg & Hall allow for rapid scaling and support, making 3D printing technology more accessible across the industry. This collaborative approach permits Alquist to focus on technology development and formulation of robust partnerships, rather than being exclusively tied down to project execution. Transforming Construction: The Future of 3D Printing Callahan emphasized, “This partnership shows what’s possible when innovation and collaboration align, and it’s only the beginning of what 3D printing will do for commercial construction.” With the ongoing development of their technology, Alquist is poised to play a major role in defining how future structures are created, presenting a compelling case for the pivot from traditional methods. The potential application of such technologies goes beyond just buildings; it has implications for broader sectors, as evidenced by cross-industry expansions such as 3D printing's utilization in the aerospace sector, with UAE firms exploring AI and robotics. Environmental and Economic Impacts: Sustainable Building Practices Amidst an increasing push towards sustainability in construction, 3D-printed structures utilize fewer resources, produce less waste, and can significantly accelerate the building process. By decreasing material costs and minimizing labor-intensive measures, 3D printing presents an economically viable solution for both builders and developers. As more companies recognize the value of sustainable practices, advanced technology like Alquist's 3D printing becomes attractive not just for economic reasons, but also for their commitment to environmental preservation. The company is setting higher standards, utilizing concrete that exceeds traditional stability requirements, which helps circumvent structural concerns often associated with new building techniques. Looking Ahead: The Promise of 3D Printing in Construction As Walmart and Alquist embark on this unprecedented journey into 3D construction, industry professionals need to be prepared for a significant shift in operational norms. Every project is an opportunity to fine-tune processes, cultivate partnerships, and elevate the industry's overall efficiency. For project control managers, cost engineers, and other mid-level professionals in the construction sphere, understanding 3D printing's implications on workflow and budgeting will be critical. The comprehensive integration of such innovations into your project management practices could lead to enhanced, streamlined execution of future projects.

12.19.2025

Trump's Bold Move: Demolition Plans for Four Historic D.C. Buildings

Update Trump's Bold Move: Demolition Plans for Four Historic D.C. Buildings The White House is making waves in the realm of architectural preservation with plans to demolish four notable federal buildings in Washington, D.C. As reported, this initiative seems to skirt statutory processes, raising eyebrows among preservationists and architectural enthusiasts alike. Understanding Brutalist Architecture The buildings in question—Robert C. Weaver Federal Building, Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building, GSA Regional Office Building, and Liberty Loan Building—are all key examples of 'brutalist' architecture, a style that emerged in the post-World War II era. This architectural movement is known for its bold, rugged forms, made chiefly of raw concrete, often embodying ideals of functionality and social purpose. Critics of the demolition argue that these structures are vital artifacts of America’s collective architectural heritage. Judith Levine, a civil liberties advocate, expressed that such demolitions would be equivalent to discarding valuable art pieces or historic artifacts without any regard for their significance. As she stated, "They are gems of America’s architectural history and its collective heritage.” The Controversial Motivations Behind the Demolition Amidst this upheaval, some reports suggest that the motivation behind the proposed demolitions stems from President Trump's broader architectural vision, which aims to replace modernist designs with classical styles, as evident from his executive orders. In an age when architecture often mirrors societal values, Trump's perspective appears to lean towards a nostalgia for traditional aesthetics. The critique from historians and preservation groups centers on the notion that erasing these brutalist buildings will not only dull the architectural landscape of D.C. but also signify a disregard for important historical narratives associated with them. A Clash of Legal Perspectives Legal battles are flaring regarding these demolitions, especially with the National Trust for Historic Preservation intervening. This organization filed a lawsuit insisting that the noteworthiness of these structures requires a thorough review before any alteration can take place. They assert that without going through proper channels, the administration is bypassing laws designed to protect America's historical assets. The White House has responded to these claims, asserting that its actions are compliant with federal guidelines, suggesting an intention to dispose of rather than demolish the buildings as historic preservationists fear. Yet, the insistence on the immediate need for a public review process indicates a significant engagement regarding the future of such sites. The Energy of Public Sentiment For many, these buildings symbolize more than mere concrete; they stand as testaments to a pivotal era in American history. The juxtaposition of President Trump’s renovation ambitions against the values held by many citizens highlights a broader tension between modern progression and historical preservation. This evolving discourse illustrates the importance of public involvement in preserving cultural landmarks. Future Predictions and Insights The aftermath of this situation could set a precedent not only for architectural practices in the nation’s capital but also for how future administrations engage with historical assets. As President Trump’s term progresses, the direction he takes regarding these buildings could inspire movements among preservationists or generate challenges to current practices across the country. What remains to be seen is how engaged and vocal the public will be in safeguarding their architectural heritage in this evolving landscape. Will communities galvanize behind preservation efforts, or will the appeal for modernity prevail? The next chapters of this unfolding narrative will likely reveal much about the American attitude towards its historical context. Take Action for Preservation Strengthening the voice of architectural preservation starts with each citizen. The best way to be involved is to support local historical societies and advocate for the protection of significant structures in your area. As debates over demolition heat up, engaging with community discussions on the value of historical preservation is imperative. Every voice counts in the conversation of our cultural legacy.

12.19.2025

Historic D.C. Buildings Face Demolition: What It Means for Preservation

Update The Controversy Behind Demolishing Historic D.C. Buildings In a contentious move that has ignited a firestorm of criticism, the Trump administration appears to be preparing for the demolition of four historic buildings in Washington, D.C. These structures, including the Robert C. Weaver Federal Building and the GSA Regional Office Building, embody the significant 'brutalist' architectural style that emerged during the post-World War II era. Critics characterize this architectural style as a vital reflection of America’s historical narrative, stating that these buildings represent the New Deal era's ambition and innovation. Legal Battles: An Ongoing Struggle for Preservation As claims circulate regarding the appropriateness of the demolition process, a former official of the General Services Administration (GSA), Mydelle Wright, has raised alarm bells about the administration's alleged disregard for statutory channels. This comes amidst a backdrop of several lawsuits filed by historic preservation organizations such as the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which argue that the administration is bulldozing forward without necessary reviews. Legal frameworks are designed to protect such historical sites, and many are questioning just how far an administration can go in its pursuit of modernization. The Value of Architectural History: What’s at Stake? Historic preservationists and civil liberties advocates argue that demolishing these structures would rob the nation of critical cultural artifacts. Judith Levine, a voice for preservation, passionately states, "They are gems of America’s architectural history and its collective heritage. They are not Trump’s to dispose of like battered file cabinets or obsolete computers." This reflects a broader discourse on the importance of preserving architectural legacy amidst relentless modernization efforts. Responses from Stakeholders: A Divided Opinion The White House has countered claims about bypassing proper procedure, asserting that the GSA is not planning demolition but rather disposal. The agency insists it is engaged in the evaluation of these properties. However, confidence in the GSA’s control over these significant projects is waning. Gregory Werkheiser, a partner at Cultural Heritage Partners, has voiced skepticism about the agency's capacity to manage the demolition and renovations effectively. Moreover, the broader context of Trump’s executive order advocating for traditional classical styles over brutalist architecture raises the question: Are we witnessing a shift in how national identity and history are represented through architecture? The Future of Federal Architecture: Implications of Modernization The political implications of remodeling iconic buildings are far-reaching. The potential replacement of the East Wing of the White House with a new ballroom—deemed necessary by Trump for hosting significant events—also epitomizes the ongoing tug-of-war between modern trends and upholding historical integrity. This presents an opportunity for stakeholders involved in the planning and management of such projects to engage with community sentiments and input on federal architecture. Conclusion: The Role of the Community in Preservation In conclusion, the imminent demolition of these historic D.C. buildings raises fundamental questions about the preservation of American history and heritage within the ever-evolving urban landscape. Stakeholders in the construction and architecture realms, including project managers, planners, and civil engineers, must advocate for ethical practices that consider historical context, cultural significance, and community sentiment. The pushback from advocacy groups highlights the need for a more integrated approach to urban development, one that honors the structures of the past while meeting the needs of the future. As we steer into an era of changing political landscapes and architectural perspectives, it's essential to remain informed and engaged. Preservationists' voices echo with urgency: dismantling aspects of history can never be taken lightly.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*