Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
The Project Controls Daily
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Cost Management
    • Schedule Management
    • Risk Management
    • Technology & Software
    • Certification & Career Development
    • ESG & Sustainable projects
    • Best Practices & Case Studies
    • Regulatory & Compliance
    • Leadership & Management
    • News & Trends
December 17.2025
3 Minutes Read

How Navigating Workforce Shortages in Construction Requires Embracing AI

A smiling middle-aged man against a brick wall

The Workforce Dilemma in Construction

The construction industry is currently grappling with a pressing workforce shortage that poses significant challenges. As highlighted by Todd McKeever, Construction Manager at Knife River, the sector faces a severe scarcity of skilled labor, exacerbated by changing workforce priorities that now emphasize work-life balance and job satisfaction over traditional motivators like pay.

For over 27 years, McKeever has witnessed the evolution of labor dynamics, noting how previous incentives have lost their allure in a competitive job market where potential workers may find equal or better offerings in sectors like fast food. Furthermore, as workers increasingly prioritize personal fulfillment, businesses in the construction industry are compelled to adapt their strategies to attract and retain talent.

The Changing Landscape of Incentives

Traditional motivators such as competitive wages and comprehensive benefits have been effective in luring workers into the construction industry; however, these have proven insufficient in capturing the attention of today's labor force. Recent trends indicate that individuals are more inclined to seek job satisfaction, inclusive work environments, and professional development opportunities. This shift must prompt industry leaders to rethink their recruitment approaches.

To enhance job appeal, construction firms should focus on creating a workplace culture that fosters safety, support, and growth. Companies must not only offer competitive compensation but also prioritize flexibility and work-life balance, as McKeever emphasizes the importance of family time in today’s workforce climate.

Artificial Intelligence: A Catalyst for Change

Amid this crisis, many are looking to technology—particularly artificial intelligence (AI)—as a solution to address the challenges of workforce shortages. AI can streamline operations and optimize resource allocation, enabling companies to do more with fewer personnel.

As articulated in an article by Francesco Iorio in Forbes, AI tools assist in cutting repetitive tasks and enhancing project management efficiency. For instance, AI-driven applications can generate superior project schedules by analyzing historical data to minimize downtime on construction sites effectively. The integration of AI can also help alleviate the skills gap by providing personalized training through simulations, making it easier for less experienced workers to develop necessary capabilities in a safe environment.

Moreover, misconceptions around AI replacing human jobs are pervasive. While it’s true that AI will change specific roles, it will also create new opportunities and allow skilled workers to engage in higher-level tasks that require complex problem-solving abilities.

Strategies for Retaining and Attracting Talent

To combat the ongoing labor shortage, attention must also be directed toward retaining existing talent. Continuous monitoring of employee satisfaction is crucial. Utilizing AI modeling can help predict turnover based on employee performance and engagement, allowing companies to proactively address issues before they escalate into resignations.

Additionally, establishing development plans that are tailored to individual employee goals can enhance retention rates. By marrying talent management with technological innovations, construction firms will not only attract skilled workers but also keep them engaged and motivated.

Building a Sustainable Future in Construction

The construction industry's battle against workforce shortages is multifaceted, involving a combination of reevaluated incentive structures, the integration of technology, and enhanced talents management practices. As noted by both McKeever and Iorio, the success of these strategies relies on adapting to the evolving needs of potential workers while effectively utilizing AI to optimize existing human capabilities.

In light of the increasing complexity of construction projects and the need for rapid progress in infrastructure initiatives across the United States, it is imperative that industry leaders recognize the importance of evolving their recruitment and retention strategies in conjunction with technological advancements. By acknowledging and addressing workforce changes, the construction sector can build a more robust and adaptive future.

As the industry navigates these challenges, it is clear that embracing innovation while prioritizing the human element will be vital for sustainable success.

Take action now! Engage with technological solutions and cultivate a workplace culture that values the well-being of employees, and witness transformation in how you attract and retain talent in construction.

News & Trends

0 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
12.16.2025

How Walmart's 3D Printed Buildings Could Transform Construction Management

Update Pioneering a New Era: Walmart's Bold Step into 3D Printing Walmart is breaking new ground in construction by partnering with Alquist 3D to create a series of 3D-printed buildings, representing a significant shift in how the retail giant approaches its infrastructure. With its recent contract for the construction of more than a dozen 3D-printed facilities nationwide, this move marks a substantial advancement in the commercial adoption of additive manufacturing in the construction industry. From Experimental to Commercialization: The Journey of 3D Construction The collaboration between Walmart and Alquist comes after the completion of a successful pilot phase that included a remarkable 8,000 sq. ft. building in Athens, Tennessee. This structure not only set records but also provided invaluable insights into optimizing 3D printing for larger, more sophisticated projects. Patrick Callahan, CEO of Alquist, highlighted the lessons learned during the first two projects—an 8,000 sq. ft. addition in Tennessee and a quicker 5,000 sq. ft. project in Alabama, which took just a week to complete with only four workers involved. “We shaved three weeks off the schedule there and saved them some money,” Callahan noted, showcasing the efficiency of 3D printing compared to traditional methods. This successful experimentation demonstrates the potential for 3D printing to revolutionize the construction timeline. Strategies for Expansion: A Revolutionary Construction Model Walmart's expansion of 3D-printed buildings speaks to a larger trend where companies are increasingly recognizing the viability of 3D printing for cost-effective, scalable construction solutions. Alquist 3D operates under an innovative model where their advanced robotics are leased to contractors instead of being labor-intensive, granting contractors the autonomy to efficiently manage construction projects. Furthermore, significant partnerships with construction and equipment rental firms like FMGI and Hugg & Hall allow for rapid scaling and support, making 3D printing technology more accessible across the industry. This collaborative approach permits Alquist to focus on technology development and formulation of robust partnerships, rather than being exclusively tied down to project execution. Transforming Construction: The Future of 3D Printing Callahan emphasized, “This partnership shows what’s possible when innovation and collaboration align, and it’s only the beginning of what 3D printing will do for commercial construction.” With the ongoing development of their technology, Alquist is poised to play a major role in defining how future structures are created, presenting a compelling case for the pivot from traditional methods. The potential application of such technologies goes beyond just buildings; it has implications for broader sectors, as evidenced by cross-industry expansions such as 3D printing's utilization in the aerospace sector, with UAE firms exploring AI and robotics. Environmental and Economic Impacts: Sustainable Building Practices Amidst an increasing push towards sustainability in construction, 3D-printed structures utilize fewer resources, produce less waste, and can significantly accelerate the building process. By decreasing material costs and minimizing labor-intensive measures, 3D printing presents an economically viable solution for both builders and developers. As more companies recognize the value of sustainable practices, advanced technology like Alquist's 3D printing becomes attractive not just for economic reasons, but also for their commitment to environmental preservation. The company is setting higher standards, utilizing concrete that exceeds traditional stability requirements, which helps circumvent structural concerns often associated with new building techniques. Looking Ahead: The Promise of 3D Printing in Construction As Walmart and Alquist embark on this unprecedented journey into 3D construction, industry professionals need to be prepared for a significant shift in operational norms. Every project is an opportunity to fine-tune processes, cultivate partnerships, and elevate the industry's overall efficiency. For project control managers, cost engineers, and other mid-level professionals in the construction sphere, understanding 3D printing's implications on workflow and budgeting will be critical. The comprehensive integration of such innovations into your project management practices could lead to enhanced, streamlined execution of future projects.

12.19.2025

Trump's Bold Move: Demolition Plans for Four Historic D.C. Buildings

Update Trump's Bold Move: Demolition Plans for Four Historic D.C. Buildings The White House is making waves in the realm of architectural preservation with plans to demolish four notable federal buildings in Washington, D.C. As reported, this initiative seems to skirt statutory processes, raising eyebrows among preservationists and architectural enthusiasts alike. Understanding Brutalist Architecture The buildings in question—Robert C. Weaver Federal Building, Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building, GSA Regional Office Building, and Liberty Loan Building—are all key examples of 'brutalist' architecture, a style that emerged in the post-World War II era. This architectural movement is known for its bold, rugged forms, made chiefly of raw concrete, often embodying ideals of functionality and social purpose. Critics of the demolition argue that these structures are vital artifacts of America’s collective architectural heritage. Judith Levine, a civil liberties advocate, expressed that such demolitions would be equivalent to discarding valuable art pieces or historic artifacts without any regard for their significance. As she stated, "They are gems of America’s architectural history and its collective heritage.” The Controversial Motivations Behind the Demolition Amidst this upheaval, some reports suggest that the motivation behind the proposed demolitions stems from President Trump's broader architectural vision, which aims to replace modernist designs with classical styles, as evident from his executive orders. In an age when architecture often mirrors societal values, Trump's perspective appears to lean towards a nostalgia for traditional aesthetics. The critique from historians and preservation groups centers on the notion that erasing these brutalist buildings will not only dull the architectural landscape of D.C. but also signify a disregard for important historical narratives associated with them. A Clash of Legal Perspectives Legal battles are flaring regarding these demolitions, especially with the National Trust for Historic Preservation intervening. This organization filed a lawsuit insisting that the noteworthiness of these structures requires a thorough review before any alteration can take place. They assert that without going through proper channels, the administration is bypassing laws designed to protect America's historical assets. The White House has responded to these claims, asserting that its actions are compliant with federal guidelines, suggesting an intention to dispose of rather than demolish the buildings as historic preservationists fear. Yet, the insistence on the immediate need for a public review process indicates a significant engagement regarding the future of such sites. The Energy of Public Sentiment For many, these buildings symbolize more than mere concrete; they stand as testaments to a pivotal era in American history. The juxtaposition of President Trump’s renovation ambitions against the values held by many citizens highlights a broader tension between modern progression and historical preservation. This evolving discourse illustrates the importance of public involvement in preserving cultural landmarks. Future Predictions and Insights The aftermath of this situation could set a precedent not only for architectural practices in the nation’s capital but also for how future administrations engage with historical assets. As President Trump’s term progresses, the direction he takes regarding these buildings could inspire movements among preservationists or generate challenges to current practices across the country. What remains to be seen is how engaged and vocal the public will be in safeguarding their architectural heritage in this evolving landscape. Will communities galvanize behind preservation efforts, or will the appeal for modernity prevail? The next chapters of this unfolding narrative will likely reveal much about the American attitude towards its historical context. Take Action for Preservation Strengthening the voice of architectural preservation starts with each citizen. The best way to be involved is to support local historical societies and advocate for the protection of significant structures in your area. As debates over demolition heat up, engaging with community discussions on the value of historical preservation is imperative. Every voice counts in the conversation of our cultural legacy.

12.19.2025

Historic D.C. Buildings Face Demolition: What It Means for Preservation

Update The Controversy Behind Demolishing Historic D.C. Buildings In a contentious move that has ignited a firestorm of criticism, the Trump administration appears to be preparing for the demolition of four historic buildings in Washington, D.C. These structures, including the Robert C. Weaver Federal Building and the GSA Regional Office Building, embody the significant 'brutalist' architectural style that emerged during the post-World War II era. Critics characterize this architectural style as a vital reflection of America’s historical narrative, stating that these buildings represent the New Deal era's ambition and innovation. Legal Battles: An Ongoing Struggle for Preservation As claims circulate regarding the appropriateness of the demolition process, a former official of the General Services Administration (GSA), Mydelle Wright, has raised alarm bells about the administration's alleged disregard for statutory channels. This comes amidst a backdrop of several lawsuits filed by historic preservation organizations such as the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which argue that the administration is bulldozing forward without necessary reviews. Legal frameworks are designed to protect such historical sites, and many are questioning just how far an administration can go in its pursuit of modernization. The Value of Architectural History: What’s at Stake? Historic preservationists and civil liberties advocates argue that demolishing these structures would rob the nation of critical cultural artifacts. Judith Levine, a voice for preservation, passionately states, "They are gems of America’s architectural history and its collective heritage. They are not Trump’s to dispose of like battered file cabinets or obsolete computers." This reflects a broader discourse on the importance of preserving architectural legacy amidst relentless modernization efforts. Responses from Stakeholders: A Divided Opinion The White House has countered claims about bypassing proper procedure, asserting that the GSA is not planning demolition but rather disposal. The agency insists it is engaged in the evaluation of these properties. However, confidence in the GSA’s control over these significant projects is waning. Gregory Werkheiser, a partner at Cultural Heritage Partners, has voiced skepticism about the agency's capacity to manage the demolition and renovations effectively. Moreover, the broader context of Trump’s executive order advocating for traditional classical styles over brutalist architecture raises the question: Are we witnessing a shift in how national identity and history are represented through architecture? The Future of Federal Architecture: Implications of Modernization The political implications of remodeling iconic buildings are far-reaching. The potential replacement of the East Wing of the White House with a new ballroom—deemed necessary by Trump for hosting significant events—also epitomizes the ongoing tug-of-war between modern trends and upholding historical integrity. This presents an opportunity for stakeholders involved in the planning and management of such projects to engage with community sentiments and input on federal architecture. Conclusion: The Role of the Community in Preservation In conclusion, the imminent demolition of these historic D.C. buildings raises fundamental questions about the preservation of American history and heritage within the ever-evolving urban landscape. Stakeholders in the construction and architecture realms, including project managers, planners, and civil engineers, must advocate for ethical practices that consider historical context, cultural significance, and community sentiment. The pushback from advocacy groups highlights the need for a more integrated approach to urban development, one that honors the structures of the past while meeting the needs of the future. As we steer into an era of changing political landscapes and architectural perspectives, it's essential to remain informed and engaged. Preservationists' voices echo with urgency: dismantling aspects of history can never be taken lightly.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*